In Indonesia 56 woman are forced to run around in the hot son for wearing non regulation shoes
I have something that is very disturbing. Nike has terrible working conditions. In Vietnam Factories, they have chemicals that can cause liver, kidney, and brain damage, that are at 177 times the legal limit. 77% of workers have to deal with respiratory problems.
Yes, and even though Nike's been around since 1964, Many people have already been expecting good quality out of Under Armour.
Yes, but soccer isn't the only sport in the world. Under Armour has been featured in movies such as Oliver Stone's Any Given Sunday and The Replacements
The products can help you stay warmer, longer, without adding unnecessary weight.
They also have a product the is titled "Cold Black" which reflects the sun.
They may have experience, but according to http://underarmour.wikispaces.com/price people expect good quality out of them, therefore, they kkep buying UA's products.
Under Armour has better quality. Under Armour price their products on quality, not just because they want a bunch of money. Their clothing is only expensive because they have good quality.
According to www.CNBC.com/id/100925505 Under Armour has better innovation. They have clothing that battles the elements.
On Dec. 29, 2005, four teenage boys from Chicago went out for a late-night drive and had a terrible accident.
If you make drivers ed earlier, 14 year olds are even more irresponsible.
But it's mostly teenagers that do. Adults can get in more trouble with the law.
You make a good point, but when you are first born, you are an infant. Look at your self now. You've grown. Your brain will keep growing more at 18. It will have grown since you have been 16 right?
Either way, it doesn't matter if you are 16 or 18 you could text and drive. 16 year olds are more likely to.
Then buy a car. But I doubt after your college fees you will be able to buy a car.
Teens are most likely with there friends. They experience peer pressure, puberty, all of which can make them act differently.
But there are so many that aren't. I've seen at least one driving accident every week caused by teenagers. And that's just the NE. There is the rest of Wisconsin and the rest of the country!
You can't tell if a person will give into peer pressure just by looking at them. You have to spend years with them. Nobody wants to be that involved.
Exactly. We all face peer pressure. Do you really think you are going to follow the laws while you are drunk. I don't think so.
Things teenagers experience: Drugs, alcohol, drunk driving, distractions, and peer pressure. All of which, are experienced behind the wheel
As it said in the experiment, it was mostly teenage girls. but men are more likely to drive drunk. It's mostly teenagers because there are so many new influences and things to try. They are introduced to drugs,alcohol, and other adult things that they don't know how to use wisely.
But there is so many teens that aren't responsible, it would be more reasonable to make everyone wait for their licence.
Exactly. It's better for the environment. It's not that hard to get around. People before cars got around. Why can't everyone now?
You may think it's an inconvenience, but it's better to
be safe than dead, or hurt. If you get hurt, it wastes more time.
Canadian researchers tried to untangle the influence of age and experience on crashes involving beginners by dividing drivers 16, 17, and 18 years old according to whether they had been driving less than a year or more than a year. The main finding, reported in 1992, is that 16 year-olds, especially girls this age, had higher rates of injury crashes than older teenagers who also were new to the road.
Yes, but when they are older, they will have more consequences with the law.
Most colleges don't allow vehicles on campus. Most campus's only allow you to walk or bike.
When they are older, they will be more cautious because they can get in more trouble with the law.
When you are older, you are wiser, and that makes you more mature. When you have to wait to get your license, you gain more maturity.
Raising the driving age would help everyone. With our technology advancing, we are getting more and more safer cars. But having safer cars doesn't make drivers safer. In fact, it may make drivers more reckless because they think having a safer car will save them when they are being careless.
Between 1995- 2004 there were 30,917 fatalities in accidents involving 15-17 year old's. 1/3 of the deaths are the teenage drivers.
Would your parents rather drive you around, or not have you around at all? Parents would rather drive their kids around, then have them get in a accident and die.
Although that may be true, I disagree. If you raise the driving age, teenagers will be more responsible, and more mature
I believe the driving age should be raised because sixteen year old's are simply not responsible enough. If they start at a older age, they will be more cautious and responsible on the road.