Nike vs. UnderArmour
Nike is better than UnderArmou
Side Score: 45
|
UnderArmour is better than Nik
Side Score: 97
|
|
|
|
4
points
4
points
Nike is also known for bright colors. In the world up in 2010 Germany Vs Spain. Spain was going down the field and they were right outside the 18 Yard box And one of the players saw his teams bright Nike cleat right behind so he dropped it back and he scored to win the world cup. So as I was saying Nike shoes have been on almost every champion. In football all the way to boxing. Side: Nike is better than UnderArmou
3
points
Nike is so good! That they have created a soccer cleat that is good in all weathers. They call it ACC they put it on one of there cleats that was made out of recycled materials. The call it All Condition Control. I got this facts from Nike.com Side: Nike is better than UnderArmou
2
points
I think Nike is better than Under Armour because according to a number of sources, such as www.athletepromotions.com, Nike has more celebrity athlete endorsements than Under Armour. This shows that more athletes trust Nike than they do Under Armour. Some athletes include Derek Jeter, Micheal Finley, Cc Sabathia and Adrian Peterson. Side: Nike is better than UnderArmou
2
points
3
points
They may have experience, but according to http://underarmour.wikispaces.com/price people expect good quality out of them, therefore, they kkep buying UA's products. Side: UnderArmour is better than Nik
3
points
2
points
6
points
Although Nike's company is worth more, so is the materials they are using. According to invesstorplace.com/zoll/06/ Side: UnderArmour is better than Nik
5
points
4
points
I believe than Nike is better because they have a better variety of clothes. According to Recomparison.com/comparisons/100549/ Side: Nike is better than UnderArmou
|
9
points
Under Armour is better than Nike. According to many sources, such as www.cnbc.com/id/1009225505, Under Armour's variety is expanding. They've rolled out new clothing that can battle the elements. They also have something called Cold Black, which is black apparel that reflects hear rather than absorb it. Side: UnderArmour is better than Nik
7
points
7
points
2
points
7
points
Under Armour has better quality. Under Armour price their products on quality, not just because they want a bunch of money. Their clothing is only expensive because they have good quality. Side: UnderArmour is better than Nik
3
points
7
points
Underarmour's quality is also better than Nike. Underarmour basically originated the ¨dry-fit" style football undershirt but has clearly branched out into so much more theses days. Underarmour for quality always wins when it comes to athletic footwear says www.thefitnesschamp.com/home/2010/1/24/ Side: UnderArmour is better than Nik
4
points
3
points
4
points
4
points
I disagree, many players are sponsoring Under Armour now. Many football players from the ravens, and also many NBA players. Under Armour is starting to have more and more sponsors. Pictures show from http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/ Side: UnderArmour is better than Nik
3
points
I think that Under-Armour is better than Nike because its clothing has better material and also has 2 layers of clinical fabric. Also most of there shirts range at about 40-50 it all depends on what material is used and how old it is! Most people would rather buy something cheaper cause they might not trust it but if lots of people buy the products and wear um in stores or at restaurants people might become to trust their company's product. Most of Under-Armour's shirts are rated by at least a FIVE, And most of there stocks get sold out during spring and winter. Their also a big part of sport's clothing that they wear when they play, Most sport's trust this brand like the NFL Football League they trust it because their product is worth the money and is reliable. That's Why I Think Under-Armour Is Better Than Nike. Side: UnderArmour is better than Nik
3
points
3
points
0
points
3
points
3
points
2
points
Under Armour's quality is improving as well. They have made more high-tech fabric that keeps the athletes dry and regulates their body temperatures. That can help the players stay active longer. According to underarmour.wikispaces.com/products Side: UnderArmour is better than Nik
1
point
I have something that is very disturbing. Nike has terrible working conditions. In Vietnam Factories, they have chemicals that can cause liver, kidney, and brain damage, that are at 177 times the legal limit. 77% of workers have to deal with respiratory problems. Side: UnderArmour is better than Nik
1
point
|