Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 6 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 6 |
Debates: | 0 |
My other sources: Editorial: Raising minimum driving age is modest statement
By: By JOHN M. CRISP, Scrips Howard News Service, as well as http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/
(I put this on the wrong side, please take this for the other side, clarifying my other last paragraph).
My other sources: Editorial: Raising minimum driving age is modest statement
By: By JOHN M. CRISP, Scripps Howard News Service, as well as http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/
Furthermore, although counterclaims say that brains are fully developed in teens 18 and over, brains in this teens truly are not fully developed until their early 20's. On this occasion, the University of Rochester Medical Center made a statement in an article that states that The rational part of a teen's brain isn't fully developed and won't be until he or she is 25 years old or so, thus, this evidence displays that this counterclaim is inaccurate.
So the evidence of my agreement shows that even if officials do raise the driving age that it will do nothing to the facility rate, thus could even raise it in the end.
Also, parents do not have time to drive their 16 year old teens for their, date(s), work, etc., especially when they have to drive their other children around too. Additionally, a statistic from the website http://goo.gl/DbYKc furthermore shows that 60% of two parents with a son or daughter under the age of 18 have a job, which they need to keep up with. This evidence, then provides the fact that parents can’t just drive their 16 year old's everywhere when the teen themselves could just drive, thus concluding the truth that in reality, parents can not keep up this act if people change the driving age.
A source which helped with the first topic: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/
No, we should not raise the driving age, because raising the driving age is like saying we should never put children in cars with an adult driver, which would then lower the rate of the faculties of children in car accidents. Although that statement seems absurd in addition to illogical, teens today, which are 16, are treated this way, along with deprived of their own rights by others. Instead, of raising the driving age, these people should trust these teens, which in return, these teens will prove themselves by showing they can be responsible for all their actions while driving, as well staying safe on the road.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |