Return to CreateDebate.comacebertrand • Join this debate community

Bertrand's ACE Debate



Welcome to Bertrand's ACE Debate!

Bertrand's ACE Debate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS 10Seidl

Reward Points:5
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
96%
Arguments:10
Debates:1
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
4 most recent arguments.
3 points

Nike is a preferred brand for Soccer and Football most of their products look at keeping out chemicals and heat.

6 points

I think that Under-Armour is better than Nike because its clothing has better material and also has 2 layers of clinical fabric. Also most of there shirts range at about 40-50 it all depends on what material is used and how old it is! Most people would rather buy something cheaper cause they might not trust it but if lots of people buy the products and wear um in stores or at restaurants people might become to trust their company's product. Most of Under-Armour's shirts are rated by at least a FIVE, And most of there stocks get sold out during spring and winter. Their also a big part of sport's clothing that they wear when they play, Most sport's trust this brand like the NFL Football League they trust it because their product is worth the money and is reliable. That's Why I Think Under-Armour Is Better Than Nike.

2 points

Yes I think the driving age should be raised because, when teenagers are young they attend to be cool and try new things well 77 percent of people in the world who get in car related accidents are people who Go fast, Try to be cool and text, Impressing somebody with what they think are smarts, And just try to do something and let go of the wheel. Alex-Koroknay-Palicz, said to a reporter that its not the car or what going on, its the inexperience that causes it not the other things around it. Teenager's under the age of 18 are legally forced to stop driving at around 10:30-4:00 in the morning, If people where to make the time start earlier it would reduce a little bit of the worlds car crashes, It also might have an effect with reducing stress on the person or on the Guardian's of that person. So that's why I think the ( Driving Age Should Be Raised )

1 point

NO DONT RAISE THEM MORE CHILDREN WILL DIE IF YOU DOOOOOOO!

10Seidl has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here