They made it so that it would keep the player dry, and regulate body temperature.

I disagree, many players are sponsoring Under Armour now. Many football players from the ravens, and also many NBA players. Under Armour is starting to have more and more sponsors. Pictures show from http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/bal-under-armour-athletes-pg,0,4817893.photogallery

I agree. Under Armour has been using the same price system, and they say it's, value-based. The reputation is unchallenged and will remain the same.

Under Armour has also been making new fabrics that will help the players. They are starting new fabrics that will beat the elements, like water, heat, ect. Says www.cnbc.com/id/100925595

Under Armour's quality is improving as well. They have made more high-tech fabric that keeps the athletes dry and regulates their body temperatures. That can help the players stay active longer. According to underarmour.wikispaces.com/products

Although Nike's company is worth more, so is the materials they are using. According to invesstorplace.com/zoll/06/nike-stores-3-pros-3-cons/ the price of raw materials they use is starting to grow, so that means the price of the apparel will go up as well.

Under Armour is better than Nike. According to many sources, such as www.cnbc.com/id/1009225505, Under Armour's variety is expanding. They've rolled out new clothing that can battle the elements. They also have something called Cold Black, which is black apparel that reflects hear rather than absorb it.

But, an infant to now has been 13 years to develop, 16-18 is only 2 years. And, your brain isn't fully developed when you're 18.

I agree. Then, if they don't have a job they don't learn the value of hard working and business wont have good employees in the future.

But, it isn't that easy to get around on a bike like it is with a car. If you want to visit family far away, or even just to get to a job or school.

Teenagers aren't the only ones that make small stupid mistakes though. Raising the driving age isn't going to solve other road problems like highway safety, and drunk drivers.

Right. Most teenagers already know driving is a serious matter.

Exactly, they're missing out on a lot if they don't get to drive. Like jobs, and if they don't have jobs they won't know the value of hard working.

Not just teenagers experience those things. People over the age of 18 are more likely to drive drunk. Teenagers aren't the only irresponsible ones.

But, not everyone does that. We just have to be careful of who we give license to.

I agree! Just because some people have been irresponsible, doesn't mean everyone has.

I agree with Kayla. Why should all 16 year old be punished if only a couple of them are being irresponsible. We are putting labels on them without giving them a chance.

Then, teenagers don't get to experience anything, or any responsibility.

According to Alex Koroknay-Palicz, men are 77% more likely to be in a car accidents than women, does that mean we should only let women drive. Of course not, raising the driving age isn't taking away very much danger.

I agree, and if you have your own job, you would want to drive there.

If that doesn't stop people from running lights and drunk driving now, why would it stop them if we raise the driving age?

But, there will be a jump in drunk driving and texting behind the wheel if we move the age to 18.

According to Alex Koroknay-Palicz, raising the driving age isn't going to help irresponsible drivers. Speeding will still be a problem, and there will be more drunk drivers and running red lights.

I agree, teenagers need to learn how to be responsible. If they don't have there license now, they're less likely to get a job when their 16, and they'll be less responsible.